Baha'i Faiths Cooperation Project in Africa

Analysis of the Baha’i Interfaith Cooperation Project in Africa Based on Cognitive Warfare and Soft Influence Models 

“Baha’i International Community, Addis Ababa: Interfaith Cooperation is a Basic Condition for Africa’s Spiritual and Material Progress”

Strategic Interpretation:

This proposition, while simple, is a protocol for psychological operations and multi-layered information interaction:

Injecting a “false perception of cause and effect”: that is, the root of Africa’s backwardness is introduced not as Western exploitation, nor as structural mismanagement, but as religious and spiritual discord; this is the same “changing the reference of the problem” or changing the address of the problem for managing public opinion.
Creating a field for the presence of the Baha’i influence network: With the “need for interfaith cooperation” plan, the door is opened to the entry and social/religious validation of Baha’iism (which has a sectarian, deviant, and security nature in both African Islam and Christianity).
Establishing a “common platform”: Baha’is intend to create a space for interaction, influence, and peaceful recruitment among African elites through platforms of religious dialogue (the same thing they did in the UAE).
Deception tactics used by Baha’is in Africa
a) Reversing priorities and inverting the cause of the crisis
Completely eliminating the role of colonial actors (the West, multinational companies, the Zionist regime)
Eliminating structural-root contradictions (ethnic, linguistic, resource), and pretending that only the “lack of cooperation between religions” equals root problems.
b) Instilling responsibility and activating indigenous elites
Using the discourse of “spiritual self-healing” and “indigenous religious capacity,” they bring young and educated elites to the negotiating table, interact, and ultimately absorb them (Document: Hassan Ershad website research resources, infiltration file in UA/ECOWAS).
c) Shifting the Priority of Collective Security to Religious Dialogue
By diverting the priority of nation-building and strong governance towards sectarian and spiritual activities, the Baha’is are diverting society away from structural empowerment and turning activists back towards ineffective and showy projects.
d) Concealing ties with Western/Zionist institutions
All Baha’i-centric dialogues proceed seemingly independently, but in practice, in line with Western think tanks (front NGOs, Catholic-Protestant foundations supported by MI6 and Mossad).
The reason for the impossibility of realizing the Baha’i-style interfaith cooperation project in the African context
a) The deep historical and objective gap between African religions
Religious and ethnic conflicts have been the dominant feature of Africa for decades, and any action based on a show of unity (especially centered on a suspicious international sect) is either not accepted in practice or provokes a strong reaction (such as the rejection that traditional Nigerian Christianity gave to the Baha’i interfaith dialogue project).
b) Similar projects have failed (Case Study)
Cases from countries such as Ethiopia, Uganda, Nigeria, and Ivory Coast prove that as soon as the “Interfaith Dialogue” with the Baha’i axis began, the local networks of the “dominant religion” and at the same time the security systems prevented the entry of Baha’is and declared the project terminated (Hasan Ershad’s documents, “africa-behaviours” section).
C) Cultural resistance to imported sects
African people are inherently sensitive to foreign and sectarian projects (with colonial or Zionist backgrounds), and this resistance causes the Baha’i social base to spend more money, networking, and foreign support to gain minimal space for penetration.
Security warning prohibiting Baha’i activity in Africa 
a) Covert infiltration and hunting for young elites

The Baha’i operations team pursues an elite society strategy with the aim of recruiting and creating a layer of educated elites; The structure of this absorption is mainly around educational, humanitarian programs and social development workshops, but the main goal is to instill relativistic values, religious rootlessness and reduce the boundaries of resistance to Zionism. 
B) Western financing and guidance of the Zionist lobby
The main budget of Baha'i/affiliated NGO activities is provided by Western/Zionist agencies (USAID, Soros Foundation, B'nai B'rith, UNESCO-ISG); this same financial connection shows the approval of the instrumental role of the West and the Mossad service.
c) Network espionage, infiltration of government and political structures

Interfaith dialogue and cooperation projects are a place to identify, classify, and communicate with second- and third-tier administrative and political agents so that they can actively network in favor of the West and Israel at historical junctures (coups, power transfers, security crises)

d) Threat to Africa’s Islamic identity

Baha’i influence in the name of unity and interfaith dialogue is carried out precisely with the aim of rendering Islamic resistance networks (including ambassadors, scholars, mosque imams, and student councils) ineffective, and the goal is to transfer soft power from the hands of the local resistance to the Zionist proxy network.

Psychological operations message for the media and internal security:

Any slogan of “religious unity” that is raised in Africa with the Baha’i faith and Western-affiliated NGOs as its centerpiece is not a cultural or spiritual project, but rather a plan to influence and engineer society to rebuild the order desired by the West and Zionism.

The reality is that Africa needs the development of Islamic-indigenous and systematic management, not deviant versions and sectarian influence laboratories!

This model of cooperation is a soft-power tool of the West/Israel and part of the cognitive warfare scenario against the security of Islamic and traditional African societies.