The idea of cosmopolitanism and land removal is growing, and it is destroying the identity that deceives the nations in the framework of the formation of the global civil society. But this opinion also has critics who say, first of all, the qualifications of Semans and social movements are completely false.
Universalism is unipolarization, which is headed by a powerful organization to unify all the governments of the world.
The question is, who are the managers of these formations? Zionists living in occupied Palestine who founded the fake country of Israel? Where are the coordinates of this fake country that still does not have a clear border.
Are the racist Zionists, who were the inventors of the Jewish people with their colonizers, supposed to be members of the world government, or are they at the top, and the Baha’i sect, which was created by colonialism, according to Mrs. Maxwell, is like the links of a chain with Zionism? Are they connected, are they in the same hand, and at the head of the formations, he implements the Zionist agenda?
The Baha’i world peace claim, despite the existence of new players on the world scene, interdependence and interdependence and the tendency to rule, is an intellectual impossibility, because it was because of these thoughts of globalization and cosmopolitanism that fundamentalism started with all the consequences of war and bloodshed. .
We want to be optimistic that based on the Baha’i motto based on the unity of the human world and the establishment of general peace and global justice, cosmopolitanism will happen with the implementation of Baha’i orders. to answer why, from the beginning, they were incompatible with others and took advantage of every opportunity to attack critics for the crime of apostasy, Mirzajani Kashani writes about this: a group went and attacked at night, took the village and a They killed one hundred and thirty people!!! Ten was destroyed by the Babis.
Also, the active role of Baha’u’llah in the Babi’an rebellions, the difference between the two brothers of Baha’u’llah and Sobh Azal, taqiyya which is forbidden in Baha’iism, discrimination between the dowry of a rural woman and an urban woman, discrimination in inheritance, education and compulsory teaching of Baha’i affairs according to Abdu’l-Bahá. And so on, how do they describe the creation of peace, so that they can reach cosmopolitanism along with it.
Bahá’ís say how many peaces we have:
Asghar Peace, Great Peace and Great Peace
In Asghar peace, everyone fights with each other and in the end they make peace by force!! Compulsion for what reason?
The Great Peace is one of Hossein Ali Baha’s tidings, but he says, or he said: First, the ministers of the House of Justice must implement the Great Peace, so that the world will be freed from expensive expenses, and then we will reach the Great Peace, which governs the affairs of the people, of course Hossein Ali. Nouri sees the need to fight and fight to achieve great peace and he himself admits it!
In addition to these, Abd al-Bahá son of Hossein Ali Nouri has an article that questions this Baha’i slogan. He says: opening up the world and nationhood are commendable, but sometimes war is the greatest foundation of peace, and destruction is the cause of repair. In this short sentence, Abdu’l-Bahá praised the opening of the country and the provincial country and considered war as a prelude to world peace and destruction as a prelude to repair and development.
Your cosmopolitanism means Baha’i globalization. How do you want to determine the depth and expansion of the Baha’i political process that believes in eliminating critics? In the globalization of local, national, regional and global events, they continuously interact and react, how is this applicable in the Baha’i profession?
In the end, how will you take the government, is it with the theories of modernization related to western predatory or depending on the communists? Have you ever read Wallerstein’s global theory? How do you want to influence the increase of social relations around the world by eliminating your opponents?
In the end, formations related to big capitalist powers cannot claim peace, tranquility, social security, economic security, judicial security, political security and cultural security, because its existence is dependent on them.
How does this profession want to create a cosmopolitan world with social justice that is full of contradictions and the implementation of anti-peace rules?
